The United States Supreme Court has on Friday rejected an unprecedented attempt to throw out election results in four battleground states that was backed by President Donald Trump and more than 100 other elected Republicans.
The lawsuit, filed this week by the state of Texas, sought to invalidate results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
In a brief statement explaining the court’s decision, the court rejected the suit without a hearing, saying Texas did not have legal standing to bring the case to challenge the results in other states: “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections.”
President-elect Joe Biden won all four states and Trump has made repeated unsubstantiated assertions that “illegal votes” cost him a second presidential term.
The Democratic candidate who won seven million more votes than the president nationwide defeated Trump by a margin of 306 to 232 votes in the US electoral college, which chooses the US president.
The lawsuit was supported by 19 state attorneys general and 127 Republican members of Congress.
The court said “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections.”
The Texas attorney-general, Ken Paxton, a Republican currently under federal investigation, had asked the US high court to dismiss over 20m votes in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, four battleground states that carried Joe Biden to victory.
Earlier on Wednesday, Trump tweeted “We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case,”. “This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!”
Also, according to a video posted to Twitter Trump said at a White House Hanukkah party on Wednesday night, “all I ask for is people with wisdom and with courage, that’s all,” adding that “because if certain very important people, if they have wisdom and if they have courage, we’re going to win this election in a landslide.”
However, the Friday’s ruling represents a setback for Trump, who has previously suggested without evidence that the result of November’s presidential election would be settled in the Supreme Court.